One of the only down-sides to being a councillor is the vast amount of post the job generates, not in terms of genuine enquiries and requests for help from constituents but in the form of pointless glossy brochures advertising housing developments, political conferences and bizarre government initiatives which have very little to do with Runnymede. Knowing the vast amount of paper I have personally thrown away over the past thirteen months, the total amount of paper wasted by councillors up and down the country must run into millions of pages.
Anyway, I am rambling. Finally, a glossy publication has arrived in my postbag which is both interesting and informative. Entitled, the “Runnymede NHS Health Profile 2008”, it provides many interesting and surprising statistics I thought it may be worth sharing on this blog.
Some observations in the report did not come as a surprise:
- The health of Runnymede residents is better than the English average with high life expectancy.
- Deaths from smoking-related illnesses are lower than the national average and have shown a downward trajectory over the past few years.
- The level of tooth decay is low.
- Healthy eating levels (seemingly despite my best efforts…) are high.
- Only one in six people are classed as “binge drinkers”
Some observations, however, did:
- Spread across the Borough, the male life expectancy between the most affluent and deprived ward is 4.3 years.
- Despite poverty levels being a long way below the national average, 1,600 children live in what are classed as “low income households”.
- One in five adults is classed as obese.
When compared to the rest of the country, ten of the fourteen wards in the Borough are in the least deprived fifth of the country with Egham Hythe, Thorpe, Chertsey St Ann’s and part of Chertsey Meads falling into the lowest two fifths.
Inside the Borough, both Englefield Green East and West are classed as being in the bottom two fifths of the Borough in terms of comparative deprivation. The two least deprived wards are (predictably) Virginia Water and (surprisingly) Egham Town whilst the most “deprived” are Egham Hythe and parts of Thorpe, Chertsey St Anns and Chertsey Meads.
Therefore, if you live in Virginia Water or Egham Town and are a man you can expect to live to 80 and if you are a woman you will reach the Methuselah-like age of 85. Conversely, the residents of Egham Hythe, Thorpe, Chertsey St Anns and Chertsey Meads can expect to live to 76 if male and 82 if female. The figures for the two Englefield Green wards are 80 and 83 years for males and females respectively.
The take-up of free school meals in Runnymede is low with only 590 children (560 white, 20 mixed and 10 Asian) receiving them each day.
The Borough is “significantly better” than the English average in terms of deprivation, children in poverty, homelessness, violent crime, child tooth decay at age 5, teenage pregnancy (under eighteen), adults who smoke, binge drinking adults, numbers of smokers, healthy eating adults, obese adults, under 15s ‘not in good health’, incapacity benefits for mental illness, deaths from smoking and life expectancy.
I’m sure I’m not alone in thinking that the NHS’ calculation that binge drinking levels are lower than the national average strange given newspaper reports last year which placed the Borough at the top of the national ‘binge drinking league. More here…
The Borough is “not significantly better” than the English average in terms of: GCSE achievement (5 A*s to C), which is surely of particular concern, physically active children, physically adults, infant deaths, roads injuries and deaths and early deaths from heart disease, strokes and cancer.
Whilst these figures are a million miles away from being scientific, they do provide an interesting general overview of the Borough, where we are succeeding and most importantly, where we’re failing.
It is clearly not acceptable that a Borough whose wards are overwhelmingly found in the bottom fifth in terms of deprivation records GCSE scores – 61.1% securing 5 A* to C grades – that are “not significantly different” from the English national average of 60.1%. I’d be fascinated if someone was able to give me a rational explanation for why this is.
That said, the 2008 NHS Health Profile for Runnymede suggests that we are, in general, both a healthy and wealthy Borough.
Posted by cllrdanielhamilton 
Posted by cllrdanielhamilton
Posted by cllrdanielhamilton
I hate to disagree with my on party but on this case, 





